Translate To Preferred Language

Search Obioku's Thoughts

Please Read Today's Featured Post

Things I Would Like To Happen Soon

For all those who believe in speaking ideas into existence and prayer in the universe will return to a person.  I simply want to write a lis...

Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

God's Word Translation

Find True Love!
The fact that you are still looking for it proves success for both those that inhibit the past and those that hope for you in their future!



Understand the Transition.
The stigma that enables curiosity can be equaled by the finality of the truth for each end of the spectrum!



Continuation!
Be mindful of your actions. As you establish leadership, your methods will be relived by others who felt you were justified whether they are seen as mistakes or successes in hindsight. I hope for the best for all who feel I am worthy of being followed.



Constant!
When this life is complete, you will have the satisfaction of saying you've seen it from start to finish! You witnessed every moment and supported every instance. What else can it be? And then the end happens because you enjoyed it more than I ever could had.



Arise!
Maybe the accomplishment was finding another path in which you are able to move forward. As always, use this opportunity to progress your better qualities from the past and improve on the flaws that might have created this to attempt to have a different conclusion. It seems like every day can be seen as time to remember who you were and simultaneously decide who it is you are trying to become!



Peregrinate!
Part of the frustration is knowing where you are and seeing your destination but the events between the two points are completely left to assumption until actuation is realized. And even then there is an act and counteract to each step growing the population in both directions.



Vista!
Your perspective is just different from others. And in each instance you both see exactly what you wanted to. What makes me sad is essential to the enjoyment of those with a differing view. My escape should not be another's permanent place. I just choose to settle for what I can get because I have never been able to get what I want. Now is the time to prepare for the future and accept the facts of my failed past.



Influence!
As long as something happens, the merits of its beginning nor the consistency of its action does not matter. Every action creates reaction and every reaction enables a following. The point is to believe a team exist even if all parts don't agree with the premise. I'm ashamed of the fact that people encourage me to participate that this is the best possible situation for me. The main problem is that negativity and degradation are just as popular as anything you can do to redeem some sense of valor to be able to regain self-esteem. Everything cuts both ways regardless of the effect to either party. When information is dispersed, it is easier to appear unified with a source even though you can be corrupting its very credibility!



Tranquil?
Positive thinking, faithful prayers and belief in something greater than one's self has led me to recant that this is my current lifestyle due to past failures from different routes. But this too has not given me something to be proud of. My initial thought, once revealed, becomes supplanted by the growing resistance to acceptance of my version of the truth. It may not be that I am right or wrong, it could just be a form of equality from another perspective which garners questioning. Any topic which can be debated can be expressed from differing views. Now I am left to wonder what options do I have when creativity is denied and conventional methods are not in your favor. At this point the value of my life has changed because access has debilitated what my skills are actually worth. When all roads are blocked do you force change or allow yourself to be succumb by ineptitude and negligence?



Loss!
The question I usually ask myself is, what do people see when they see me. Am I a person or just something to be used and removed? There seems to be a level of concern but never interaction. And if participation is not the goal of the connection, however minute it may be, is it negligible in the end? And what is the substance of the concern and how integral am I to the entire situation as is? More questions than answers and less people to have significant feelings. The strange part is I'm not sure if I should be hurt if there was nothing on the other end. Maybe my imagination of what is tangible is out of the loop. As usual, it comes to a stop when I am no longer needed or have served my purpose. The loneliness continues and the desperation is evident but don't bother to be the one to initiate a transformation, simply be the one who finds my existence to be the inherent issue. I wish I had a friend! Thank you!



Service!
Sometimes there is no reward for improvement. Depending on your previous form, you may just not be the worst instance of yourself anymore. This does not have to be celebrated or even acknowledged. People who are consistently at a similar place or higher find staying there enough. Since this is new to me, I had expectations of something better which may not be reasonable for individuals who are already here. Another lesson I had to learn is everyone is not speaking to me or in my favor. Assuming a message is for you when it is not explicitly stated simply leads you towards the incorrect path. I find myself wishing for my fantasy to come to fruition instead of helping another unite their reality. It becomes narcissistic to feel you are involved in affairs for which you are not present. After the many stages of hope, I have seen that the heroes journey might not be to save the fallen soul but to remind you why humility is a preeminent characteristic to comprehend. Everything I thought I was can be changed and everything I am has been seen before. And in the end, the mistake was thinking you knew more than those who oppose your view.



Attune!
It has been arduous to present a point of enlightenment after making what I now think were bad choices. I do not want negativity to be the motivation but it appears to be the recent experience prior to collecting my thoughts. The chances to recover have been minimized and the debt is starting to seem insurmountable. Even though I had expectations to reach a positive destination, it could again be the long road traveled of the wrong option. As I seemingly stray further and further from society, the division of being labeled as the minority or the exception is not as clear. The presumed rarefied status will either be the culmination of a new achievement or the absolute collapse of my perception of saneness. There cannot be a claim of being mislead or misinformed if I brought myself to this point by my own accord. There have been many moments of distress and great worry but if those emotions were to be displaced by the greater sense of refined advancement, it would truly feel as if a calling was evoked and replied to respectably.



Prudent!
Reflecting on what places me in the present moment is, at times, a somber task. There have been very few moments of praise for myself. My conscious state of being can be lifted with the idea that a revived future is still a possibility. This occurs when I see the signs that the best traits of humanity are showing. The sentiment is often appreciative and reassuring. But that does not alter what brought me to this point. My mistakes usually entails offending groups of people which then leaves me isolated and alone to merely regret my words. And the result is not the typical two steps forward then a step back. My experience is more of all progress arrives at an immediate and abrupt stop. It causes a drastic switch to how to proceed in each case. I want to move steadily toward a more universally accepted position but it does not seem to be in my nature. Not necessarily conforming to society but embracing what it presents and finding my space for its approval. Logic dictates that this will lead to something eventually but that day will always seem to be later rather than sooner.



Cure!
The discovery that I am not a perfect being is not a new revelation to me. Reaching for excellence has not reaped the benefits I once sought. Some mistakes are fixable. The correction can be applied by myself or another who has a pure comprehension of the intent. My hope is that there's help to add what's missing or modification for an enhanced effect. My fear is that some errors are more severe where it leads to an adverse finish without an amicable place to return. And with eminence or abandonment hanging in the proverbial balance, the task is getting daunting. The ingrained process has really left me depleted. The impression I get is that this won't be seen as practical if it were to exclusively end as a teachable moment of what not to try to be. As I strive to align my beliefs up with what is pleasing for those intricately involved, there is a sense of favorability towards my objective. I am not always welcomed with the guarantee of a honest approach however. Eventually there will be less pressure and less scrutiny which could allow me to just be a person doing what is right and what is good.



Suspicion!
There is a naturally progressive apprehension I have about what is to come. Lacking evidence prevents me from the certainty that there is something to be upset for. So it leaves me in a state of skepticism that things will ever get better. There has only been loss and destruction as of late and that pattern has continued while increasing in frequency. It does hurt and it seems to be intentional. The feeling is that I am systematically being used to only generate my opposition. Every idea that I present, independent of where it is seen or heard, is met with an equal and opposite reaction. There is a clear absence of any sort of uniformity or solidarity for positive momentum. The sense of being trapped to your last resort to only have your thoughts warped and reproduced for a different venue is absolutely demoralizing. I'm being conditioned to know that this is not only possible but it is acceptable. It appears as a case study to find your weakness and not only destroy my character but always strengthen all whom can use that as information against me. There is not an exit and I do not have much left, so what else is there to take from me?



Kismet!
It sounds trivial but to be surrounded by love does not seem to be enough. The concept is everywhere in varying degrees. Each time a door is opened, either for new person or new opportunity, it can be a connotation of that feeling. And though I have that at this time, I am not happy. What's missing is the ability to stimulate the spark needed to control what happens to me. I constantly get froze with no immediate options that are to my liking for prosperity. As I age, there is no one to blame for this. It may just be my very passive approach that allows me to be cornered. Once I felt as if I had to fight for everything I had but it caused so much stress and tension to have possession. The complete alternative is to find that people do not willingly provide more than is required. Even now there does not seem to be concern for my life directly but how events can indirectly be attributed to others for credit. No one wants to be the first to say I care but the first to say I started this or I caused that. I want to be loved by my definition and not just have the word thrown at me with emptiness. The only problem is I do not know what that constitutes because I do not think I have ever experienced it in my life. Every day I hope that when I am met with love, it will be the true catalyst that I have always dreamt to enjoy. And every day I am left waiting for it to happen.



Salvable?
There is always a point at which you must analyze where you are and where you are heading to. If this is not done perpetually, you either lose the sense of the realistic present or how far you are from your goals in the future. As of now, I have exhausted nearly all of my resources and want to know the place where and with whom I can start over. In review of myself, I am not the person I was but I do not seem close to where it is I want to be. This is the conflict as I see it. I have improved mentally and spiritually with a fair amount of significance. And with that being true, I have no way of sustaining myself and I am beginning to break down physically. Which is really better for society, the ability to perceive accurately or the ability to perform with a high degree of quality. The more important question maybe which can be recovered fully once it is lost. Having this knowledge does not help me to know where to go forward in this instance. I know what to work on but I am reduced to needing an immaculate reverence for ascension to occur. As the opportunities become rarer my primary responsibility is to provide admirably and hope that my presence is never seen as regrettable but first I must develop the habits that are recommended to be chosen competently by those who see potential for what I am able to do.



Adhere!
In periods such as this I feel as if I have relinquished all that I crave for what I have been given. I do not understand why I have been walled off to this extent. The feeling can be epitomized as forced assimilation to a preferred way of life which is not in my best interest. I relish the times of conversation, times of shared emotion and times of genuine friendship. These have been replaced by whatever is necessary to make it to the next moment. What can be gained by this and why am I asked to accept the burdensome role? If this is the course to become something much more meaningful than I am now then I have a question. Is others liking what you have turned into worth you disliking what you are personally? There is a possibility that the painstaking process could be as enjoyable as the end result for some. For this to not lead from the dark tunnel to the first signs of light towards my dreams would only mean I have committed myself to the wrong virtues and concepts of today's world. And to be on the wrong path at this point would be very detrimental to what was anticipated to lie ahead. I can simply consider this parable, if I had made someone happy then I hope that may be returned but if I have done the opposite then those sentiments were and will be reciprocated. I can try to offer an apology to all whom are offended while plead for help from anyone who finds sympathy and therefore can.



Equilibrant!
Currently the only thing I see is the battle of opposing forces. I try to constantly release feelers to pinpoint where to find cooperation and where there is resistance. The conscious effort to provide positive energy has not gotten me to where I want to be at the moment. It seems like in the past there was always cooperation independent of whether my request was good or bad. The difficulty is in making the pathway to enable a different way to go. Then the realization that sometimes people are directed towards a certain destination was my epiphany. The dilemma to devise a new route or take the proven trail was not my choice to make. I feel as if I am being channeled to something that I could not achieve on my own. I am not there yet and cannot conceive how much longer it may take. It is not a test of patience anymore, it is now a test of morality. Why would this be happening and what do you think the ending could be? Maybe this is the finality or maybe its still getting prepared for a greater design. One thing I am sure of is if I am involved then I am part of the plan. How much of the plan I contribute has not been determined yet. The strangest feeling is to think you are really doing good and then encounter an overwhelming sense of inertia. All I can do is make others aware of my intentions and hope that people can assist in what I am trying to accomplish. I have not reached there yet but my optimistic view says there is always time for a prayer to be answered.



Resilience!
My present standing with all persons of interest is a bit of a concern for me. I am confused by the sheer immobility that was on display lately. It is probably due to a lack of necessities on my part more than any deterrent from external variants. At first, I did not find these conditions to be suitable to be the premier person of distinction I would like to become. The harboring of conjectures about insolence, rage and spite to the brink of virtual insanity has subsided. And while there is still a very real gap between where I am and where I want to end up, that interval is now seen as being a process of separation to attain a healthier mind state. The situation as I envision it now is a more organic and natural way to handle a complex archetype. It has turned to a point where I want to win but not at the cost of anyone else. I want to participate but I cannot disturb what is currently taking place. From the other side, I can see how my words resonate. I can see how what I am doing matters but I can't reach those same entities to enhance what is happening now. Maybe this is the time of the transition where what I have done will be thought of as relevant. The time where the way I went about this, the process itself becomes respected to some level. Maybe now is when I am not weird among my contemporaries but I harken back to a past presence that is revered.



Obdurate!
To me, I feel as if I have tried to adapt to every request from others. I've conformed in my approach and considered all information that was presented to me. And still the exertion to adjust has yielded nary a good result. Hindsight has taught that it is easier to maintain consistency by any means than it is to return from falling to regain a previous position. One viewpoint is that leniency may have been granted to stop moving in reverse. The other is that there is a present standard that generated rigidity to move forward as it has a sedentary stature to be compared to. I can choose to completely lose myself or continue to wait for something different to work in my favor. But ultimately, I must decide what is this experience worth. If it were not to be helpful in my life, could there be an alternative for the next person whom finds themselves in such a predicament. See things may change for me but another may never have to face this as there will be a cause to prevent it. History says that these characters are to be persecuted by their peers. The contrast is in that I am less about challenging authority than I am for sharing my perspective on why this is troubling. I feel there is a problem while the majority believes the adage "if it ain't broke don't fix it" still applies. Even worse for me, I can not stand with others of the same plight as I seem to be a unique case. There was not a gathering for injustice against an oppressor or a system that must alter its tenets and principles for a misrepresented population. It started as just one person whose value was not able to be quantified by the society in which he lives. The ascertainment of an innate ability that may be special was deemed impractical and later ineffectual. I can not define or explain it but I think that the interest in it can be spoken of in the same way. So I guess the question must be asked whenever the ruination occurs with the establishment of nomenclature, are you one of the many stars in the night sky or are you the only sun in the morning? And whichever you find yourself to be, why do you feel that way?



Bestride!
Again I am at a point where concessions are needed. When one is dependent upon another to move forward, you must meet their requirements and their standards in the given window to get the job done. Ordinarily, if you cannot comply with that then it is you who will be at a loss. We live in a time where there is always another option for whoever has the obvious advantage. If you are upset with being replaceable, you are defined as a tradable commodity and not the critical asset you once presumed. You could become vital to a new venture but can you discover that resolute setting with the rational ambition and urgency needed to encompass it. In verbal terms, you would primarily be swapping the insult for encomium. If you can, you may feel at home with your stated goal or purpose. If not, you could endlessly wander from place to place looking for what you want with a constantly empty feeling. The conundrum being faced is to move on from what you never had to what you never knew existed. As you try to find the meaning in that statement: the clock continues to tick, the earth continues to spin and you are still the same person you were yesterday. Now I know I can determine my next mission and my next step but I do that not knowing my final destination, only the direction I wish to go. As you travel that all important trip, just think about whether you have enough information to conclude if you are closer to its beginning or the end.



Discursive!
I used to think of myself as some sort of recluse or hermit. There are situations where I am very reserved and apart from the norm. This has evolved to the preponderance of my thoughts becoming rhetorical questions and introverted findings projected to something else. And as I got accustomed with this circumstance through repetition, I feel I am not that different from others. There is an apex of being consumed to exist for an instance, that you can lose touch of what was before and to come afterwards. The effect of that is only being able to draw parallels to what you have witnessed for better or for worse. No person can be everywhere at once but that absence can help in understanding what others may hold dear. The fragmented sections start to iterate in fractal like examples of what they believe is best for them. In some ways there is a tinge of randomness but otherwise religion can be implied. See as the ideals are passed down, they develop into a doctrine for a tried and true way to abide by. If you do not fit in accordance with what's accepted, you will be seen as very stubborn or original with that interpretation being left to those who disagreed beforehand. In any event, you can either show how you are similar to what is already familiar or present a notably diverse way to conduct oneself. The key is not to disrupt or overturn the past but have an alternative for the offing. And whether it is a play on words or a game of numbers, everyone can be a part of something.

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

The Inherent Rationale Of Perception

Perception is one of the most important factors affecting our day to day lives as human beings.  I believe it is one of the most underrated aspects of society in general.  The way events, acts and people are seen and from whose viewpoint is the proverbial thin line between one extreme to the other.  How do we define poor?  Poor can be defined by having devout understanding for wealth.  The same can be said for many contrasting positions such as good and evil, fast and slow, guilty and innocent, light and dark et cetera.  We determine what the extremes are, the outermost regions, and whatever falls in between is still up to the better parts of discretion.  We take time to make accurate discernments about what allows someone to have a certain title and then immediately define everyone else against that standard.  But how do we identify the standard?  Is it the first instance of something or is it when we happenstance the theoretical difference that challenges all that we thought we knew previously?  Is there wisdom in taking a position supported with an evidentiary credence or is one just ahead of the curve to have a radical point of view that will be fully realized at a later time?  Why is this important?  Why is it done?  And what are the criteria used for such classifications?  Again this is all in line with perception.  Many times the people who are designated to assert such distinctions are in neither the uppermost or lowermost divisions.  What would be the motive for being involved?   Can this be done completely from a neutral and nonpartisan position or will it be demonstratively biased in glorifying self-assurance or denigrating in self-destruction?  How we view things, the assertions we make, the judgments we conclude and the resulting consequences are as varying as we are, as fluid as we are and as strange as we can be but at any given point and time it can be the most apropos choice that enables a life or death outcome to which if it were left to the opinion of another person, had occurred in another venue or happened at another time everything could be colossally changed.   
Why would I question perception as being the critical agent?  Let me present a recent example.  There have been a few cases of law enforcement taking the lives of minority youth.  The topics to debate are always race relations and the responsibility of authorities in our communities.  Without getting into specifics of the cases and how they transpired, let me dissect the opposing sides here.  As for the minority’s perspective, the plight of the African-American in this country is as controversial a subject as any to deliberate.  We can talk about how men and women were taken from their homeland to become embattled thralls in a land where their humanity was trivial to the new purveyors.  We can start there.  We can then go to the civil rights period, several years later, where the progenies having achieved freedom and developed rudimentary abilities, no longer feel that being segregated to the lowest rungs of American society is tolerable.  We can grow from there.  We can look at today where we celebrate each minority accomplishment of significant equality to what has been consistently done by other races as the moment of truth.  There are now minority millionaires and billionaires, minority politicians, minority influence on culture and there is a persistent continuance towards more progress of the sort.  The subsidiary issues of the hidden ire from only being able to reach someone else’s past as your pinnacle is agonizingly demoralizing.  To admit the sense of beatitude for meeting the granted ceiling of glass that another has allowed has a disposition of its own.  See a breakthrough for one group is the settlement of another in that circumstance.  Where they were is now apparent to you but you cannot fathom where they are going.  There is still great separation moving forward into the future.  To deal with that and have it placed in your face every day can be insolent and haughty.  The resentment and animosity of the past is sedentary and immobile in people whom did not directly experience such heinous acts.  Now what is the story behind the police officer who is usually of a different race?  The Caucasian of today has the state of mind of an inherited appanage of superiority that may or may not be accompanied with feelings of remorse.  Remorse felt possibly for what was done to the other inhabitants of that time or the fact of how things are now as a result of those efforts.  History can tell the story of their people constructing the country through not only what means were necessary but could only be done by specimens with such fertile ambitions.  Other races should be grateful for being spectators to what we have available to us now from their most arrogant vantage point.  Couple that mentality with the role of law enforcement.  Individuals pledge their life to servitude for the protection and safety of others as a way of earning income.  Some from privileged backgrounds with a desire to perform a sworn duty and some from troubled pasts including abuses or offenses against them for which they now want to be on the other side of that matter.  Add to that being assigned to areas where their prerogative to uphold the rules and regulations of a fair and just culture could be questioned at every turn.  
What happens when the sides meet and there is conflict?  How does it start?  Well the claim of harassment from law enforcement against young men of color is rampant.  The pertinent inquiry for this conversation should be whether it is also misguided.  For every time there is provocation, how many times was a suspect fitting of the depiction of the alleged criminal?  How many times are there accusations of crime where a minority is involved or accompanying someone charged of wrongdoing?  To provide descriptive statistics would not be conducive to the argument because one case where the report is accurate provides for the instances where each must be seen through for the entitlement of the victim and the obligation of the officer.  So in most occasions, law enforcement is only trying to execute their assigned job.  The alleged perpetrator, remembering history, would be upset with the actuality of the essence of this confrontation even if fitting the supposed characteristics.  The challenge is endangering to both parties.  Law enforcement can only act on the information they were provided and the faculties of one’s own judgment.  The citizen’s innocence is highly dubitable to say the least.  The citizen now feels a sense of jeopardy from an entity that is not required to be threatening.  The ways of which the events evolve from this extends from approach and reactions.  One could or could not say that law enforcement is erroneous for getting the suspect’s attention.  Is there ever a right way to proceed in a direction that you cannot confirm until it is resolved?  The suspect’s response to these allegations could be accepting as in the wrong or argumentative over such disrespect.  The officer can respond calmly and assert the reasoning of his presence or becoming aggressive instantaneously to apprehend and stop a nuisance.  With disregard for the guilt or innocence at the highest point of escalation, when should deadly force be applied?  For every heartbreaking case of law enforcement overstepping its bounds in ceasing the existence of a person’s life, are there equivocal stories of the situation being reversed?  Would there be extensive reaction and outrage if an officer died in the line of duty for not acting fast enough?  An instance where there was every attempt to reach out to a disorderly criminal and bring them into custody moderately.  The result of that method was death by the aforementioned assailant or a witness in the area.  And furthermore, the felon is able to escape and never correctly identified again.  Do we just bury the person in an honorable service or do we impose that they did not dare to do what’s needed to merit the uniform they wore?  Is it written off as a rare occurrence or do sanctions get modified to ensure that this isolated incident is inauspicious?  You cannot have a protest to force officers to have tougher stance against criminals, right?  And after all the debate and all of the fallout, what happens to the person who started the altercation.  Not the officer or the suspect but the one who placed the 911 call or spoke with law enforcement.  Going in sequential order, you could not probe into the morality of the informant or victim because the report was justified with police action.  Or could you?  The central point of perception is always debatable based on the significance of the foundation of its perspective.  Did they see the right person, were the features of the person given properly and does it really require police intervention?  When lives are lost as the result of a purported exertion, is that the sort of justice that was sought or did you just want the person frightened and punished?  So when that occurred, do you regret the incident or thankful that people know not to bother your place of residence or business anymore?  What are the expected results from contacting authorities nowadays and do we now use that resource knowing what is at stake?  The ethical position, or lack thereof, of having someone else act from your behest gives a sense of fulfillment of purpose and power of aptness.  There is no direct correlation to the committing of murder but being the cause of it has repercussions that can only be addressed at one’s own latitude of sentiments.  
Law enforcement versus the population it has sworn protect is poignant to determine why things happen and how it could all be different.  Let me now turn the focus towards religion to once again reveal how perception creates so many different lanes for the world we live in.  With no offense meant for anyone’s beliefs, I will distinguish the major religions of today as Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism and Sikhism.  My sincerest apologies to the believers of faiths that were not named in the previous statement, my perception of awareness would be to blame.  Now this will not be to determine which religion is paramount.  Nor will it be to put one against the other and challenge the tenets and origins of any set of beliefs.  I will go through the facets of each to try to recognize how each divides itself from the rest and persuasively uses perception to craft institutional conformity for the majority of its followers.  Hopefully I can do that successfully while minimizing the controversy that could stimulate.  How do we differentiate the six named?  Some would say the chief partition components are region, time and core beliefs.  Hinduism and Buddhism are supposedly derived from the Vedas text from the southern Asian regions.  Judaism, Christianity and Islam are said to be derived from the ways of Abraham or Abram, depends, with each using a different resource as its principled figure.  These are taught to have originated in the western Asian and eastern European regions.  If we were to accept the belief that Judaism begins from Abraham, it would be the eldest of this list.  If we were to acquiesce to the time of Moses and the writings of the Torah, this would place it second to Hinduism which has not pinpointed an individual as its founder.   Hinduism has tenets of freedom where each person has the capability to determine their purpose for living.  This is very open to interpretation for followers to define themselves.  It is characterized by concepts of righteousness, love, livelihood and karma.  These are all very good things to adhere to.  From my understanding, it does not directly condemn evil and immorality however.  How events involving those devious actions should be addressed seems to be ambiguous.  Could it be that they were not seen during that time?  Or were they just taken as part of one’s choices?  Next we move to Judaism who introduces a divine doctrine for how to behave within the religion.  Were the early recipients of Jewish teachings even aware of the presence of Hinduism during that period?  If they were, was this presumed to be more suitable for its people as it decrees control?  If they were not, did Hindus stay confined to a certain area and passed acumen to their descendants preventing the spread to other areas of the planet?  Giving specific details on what is good and what is bad has come to be a favored position of religion since Judaism.  Define the roles of plausible protagonists and antagonists for all to be aware of.  Here there is disparity for the genders of believers, observance of holy days, esteemed places of worship and religious laws.  Jewish practices that must be obeyed and rules for people who desire to become new converts.  There is a perceptible difference in one being all encompassing and one being restrictively inclusionary with what it holds dear.  See the privilege of being part of this religion was part of its appeal.  Buddhism then begins with the birth of Buddha.  With Buddhism, we see a religion that is established with a person.  The “enlightened one”, as he was called, taught people personal lessons that would lead to a holier life.  The truths of negativity, how it came about and how to get through it were his canons to alleviate ignorance and discover divine insight.  For one to really find inner peace, you must be able to refrain from all realities nonadjacent from that precept.  Jesus Christ and Christianity are noticeably the prima facie deity and transcendent religion that will be mentioned in this paper or any other forum.  After being born to a virgin mother, his life was chronicled and mainly mesmerized ever since.  He was as generous and honest as we have ever seen.  His touch could heal but his words could equally scorn.  He was the ultimate dividing force at which even our concept of time accedes to the before and after of his stint here.  Beginning from Judaism, he seemingly embodied its concepts and improved their teachings to how to behave at every step.  He gained disciples and confidants by the way he carried himself not by how it was taught to them.  It was his ways and how he interacted with those that needed him that ultimately stood the test of time.  His belief in being the direct descendant of a Holy Father produced the invincible spirit that far outlived his flesh.  In the similar region of western Asia and eastern Europe, his namesake was adopted and proliferated with the spread of the Church and the Romans.  You cannot question its relevance today as it is extant in nearly every segment of this Earth.  Even with all this to support it, there are still other beliefs and others that are thought to be equally significant.  Many religions revere Christ but think he was a piece to the puzzle and not the entire picture as Christians do.  Now let us encounter the penults of Islam and Muhammad.  Islam has a slightly different view of its symbolic figure Muhammad.  Muhammad is not directly seen as the person to worship.  He is more of a prophet of God’s message to humanity.  For Muslims, this incarnation is similar to that of Adam, Abraham and Jesus.  The contrast let those people be manifestations of God’s plan but not the emphasis of your adulation.  Unification with the most high is the only goal.  Lastly, we can see Sikhism.  Sikhism was founded by Guru Nanak whom reemerged to denounce two religions after his own suspected death.  Sikhism values revealing truth and living in the most honest way constantly.
From this timeline, one could inadvertently assume an order of descent being evident.  If that were to be true, then what creates a new set of beliefs?  When something is formed and sculpted, there may not be room for modification.  We do not see amendments to religion as seen in law.  Rather than contesting the past, we see examples of very high level entities presenting themselves with great favor through the juxtaposition of both sincere benevolence and self-indulgence.  With that being true, once it is proven we do not conform to anyone who tries to replicate the pious deeds of the deified leader.   That endeavor can be interpreted as blasphemous impersonations that can seriously impede or end one’s life.  When faced with that reality, you can question whether the future of a group of people is ever worth a single person’s present.  We usually see this as a noble sacrifice for the betterment of generations ahead of one’s time.  And contemporaneously burden ourselves not to be identical due to the fact that our perception does not permit another try at having the same triumph.  We usually adhere to the premise that there can only be one.  Everyone who observes that truth falls in line under the designed umbrella.  Religion seldom agrees with the position of any assemblage that does not fit the material accordance of its best disciples.  The commonplace orientation is regularly to edify its own concepts to maintain and enable supporters.  While some are respectful of other sects, the point that more than one exists means choice and competition among the world’s population.  As we evolved the appearance of sundering among each’s own ranks become palpable.  The denominations of Christianity, bifurcation of Islam and fractioning of Judaism are just the epitome of this topic.  Though all are different, there was instantiation from a singular point.  After many iterations of ideology from progressively unique perspectives, the inaugural summon for unity gets disintegrated by deviating angles on how much zeal is appropriate for having fervent passions.  Could there be a lesson learned from the internal partitioning that provides for dissolution of external faiths?  Or is it just illustrations of dissension for supplemental plotting?  Can everything be reverted to the idea of one god and humans being inherently good or do we require each case of divinity to have a private ensuing retinue of its own?  
Our perceptions are not just grounded in what is pellucid to our five or more senses.  We interlace personal experiences of the past, tactful sagaciousness and cognitive dissonance or lack thereof.  This does not just apply to the most creditable persons we have but also the inept.  So the heft that we place in it could be both the shining archetype and ignominious fallacy considering the temperament of the supplier.  Even then the conclusion we come to is explicated by all that advocates for our side and everything else that disaffirms can be nullified with the insulation of what is perceptible to each one of us.